Biologic

Seal of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. In addition to a bald eagle, the artistic design in the center of the seal also contains a hidden image of a stylized flaming torch. Disturbingly, the symbolic human faces on the right side of the torch image are placed in such a way as to suggest that they are being burned / consumed by the torch flame. Flaming torches are the primary symbols of U.S. Army Intelligence, U.S. Army Civil Affairs, and U.S. Army Psychological Operations. Additionally, the words “HUMAN SERVICES” are arranged on the outside edge of the seal directly behind the symbolic human faces, while the literal and phonetic similarity between the terms “HUMAN SERVICES” and “HUMAN SACRIFICES” should be noted.

Emblem of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The background of the emblem is an abstract image of a burst of light, as if emanating from an unseen source such as a torch flame. Flaming torches are the primary symbols of U.S. Army Intelligence, U.S. Army Civil Affairs, and U.S. Army Psychological Operations. Also, the C.D.C.P. name contains an angram of the word “Center” and an angram of the word “Nation,” both of which are operative words in the official motto of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (“The Work of a **Nation**. The **Center** of Intelligence.”). Additionally, the C.D.C.P. name contains an angram of the word “free” and an anagram of the word “veritas,” the Latin word for “truth.” “Free” and “truth” are operative words in the unofficial motto of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency: “And you will know the ***truth***, and the **truth** will make you ***free***.” – John 8:32

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Origins: Malaria Control

In 1942, when the U.S. was mobilizing for the Second World War, the U. S. Public Health Service set up a program to protect the personnel of military bases in the Southeastern states from malaria. This disease had long been rampant in the area, and posed serious threats to the health of the military and civilian populations. The program known as Malaria Control in War Areas (MCWA) was created to carry out the work. The lack of space in Washington due to the war effort allowed the program to base its headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia, and closer to the work at hand. During the war years, the program was expanded to include the control of other communicable diseases. Because its work was so successful, a new organization was created around the nucleus of MCWA, the Communicable Disease Center (CDC). The date was July 1, 1946.

United States Public Health Service – History

The origins of the Public Health Service can be traced to the passage, by the 5th Congress of the United States, of “An Act for the Relief of Sick and Disabled Seamen” in July of 1798.^[6] This act created Marine Hospitals to care for sick seamen. They were initially located along the East Coast, at the harbors of the major port cities. As the boundaries of the United States expanded, and harbors were built on other coasts, so too were marine hospitals.^[7] The Marine Hospital Service was placed under the Revenue Marine Service (a forerunner of the present-day Coast Guard) within the Department of the Treasury.^[8]

A reorganization in 1870 converted the loose network of locally controlled marine hospitals into a centrally controlled Marine Hospital Service, with its headquarters in Washington, D.C. This reorganization made the Marine Hospital Service into its own bureau within the Department of the Treasury.^[8] The position of Supervising Surgeon (later titled the Surgeon General) was created to administer the Service, and John Maynard Woodworth, (1837-1879), was appointed as the first incumbent in 1871.^[9] He moved quickly to reform the system and adopted a military model for his medical staff; putting his physicians in uniforms, and instituting examinations for applicants.

United States Public Health Service – Organization

Officers of the Corps wear uniforms similar to those of the United States Navy with special PHSCC insignia, and the Corps uses the same commissioned officer ranks as the U.S. Navy, the U.S. Coast Guard, and the NOAA Commissioned Officer Corps from ensign to admiral, uniformed services pay grades O-1 through O-10 respectively.

According to 5 U.S.C. § 8331, service in the PHSCC after June 30, 1960 is considered military service for retirement purposes. Under 42 U.S.C. § 213, active service in the PHSCC is considered active military service for the purposes of most veterans’ benefits and for antidiscrimination laws.^[5]

Seal of the U.S. Operation Warp Speed, a joint venture of the U.S. Department of Defense and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The seal contains a graphical image of a hexagon. The word “hexagon” contains a partial anagram of the word “change.” “Change” is a word in the motto of U.S. Army Psychological Operations (“Persuade ***Change*** Influence”), and refers to the deliberate altering of human thoughts and behaviors through the subversive activities of this U.S. Army division.

U.S. Military BioWarfare

The Pentagon Bio-Weapons

Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) – Cooperative Biological Engagement Program (CBEP)

How the U.S. Infiltrated Post-Soviet States with Biolabs

Inside the U.S. Government’s Top-Secret Bioweapons Lab

The Dugway Proving Ground is a US government facility that tests some of the deadliest chemical and biological agents on earth. Despite the dangerous experimentation, the facility has had some major slip ups. Watch the video above to learn more.

Scanning the U.S. Global Biochemistry Laboratories Via Satellite

Do you know the sheer number of the biochemistry labs and facilities the U.S. owns and funds worldwide? Do you know how dangerous they are? Watch the video and let the satellite imaging give you some idea.

Concerns Raised over U.S. Fort Detrick Lab as COVID-19 Rages

As the coronavirus sweeps the world, people are beginning to realize the great destructive potential of tiny microbes to human health and society. The pandemic also evoked memories of the previous incidents surrounding biological experiments. This is why recently, a U.S. military laboratory, Fort Detrick in Maryland has become the center of a heated discussion.

U.S. State Department: Ukraine has Biological Research Facilities, Concerned Russian Forces may Seek to Gain Control

Senator Marco Rubio Questions Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines on Ukraine Biolab Security

U.S. Biological Warfare Program History

The United States did not begin a biological warfare offensive program until 1941. It was concern about the Japanese biological warfare threat that motivated the United States to begin to develop biological weapons. During the next 28 years, the United States initiative evolved into an effective, military-driven research and acquisition program, shrouded in controversy and secrecy. Most research and development was done at Fort Detrick, Maryland, while production and testing occurred at Pine Bluff, Arkansas, and Dugway Proving Ground, Utah. Field testing was done secretly and successfully with stimulants and actual agents disseminated over wide areas. A small defensive effort paralleled the weapons development and production program. With the presidential decision in 1969 to halt offensive biological weapons production, and the agreement in 1972 at the international Biological Weapons Convention never to develop, produce, stockpile, or retain biological agents or toxins, the program became entirely defensive, with medical and nonmedical components. The U.S. Biological Defense Research Program exists today, conducting research to develop physical and medical countermeasures to protect service members and civilians from the threat of modern biological warfare. This is clipped from the 2000 video Biological Warfare and Terrorism: The Military and Public Health Response produced by the Department of the Army and the Food and Drug Administration.

COVID-19

Omicron Outbreak Inducing Whiplash for Many Americans

Americans Suffer Pandemic Whiplash as Leaders Struggle With Changing Virus
An evolving virus and 18 months of ever-changing pandemic messaging have left Americans angry, exhausted and skeptical of public health advice.

Whiplash for the Concert Business as the Delta Variant Rages On
Some tours and festivals are canceling, but others are forging ahead. As Covid-19 cases rise in the United States, artists weigh the risks and benefits of getting back on the road.

Confused? Overwhelmed? You May Have Travel Whiplash.
Going from one place to another right now can mean being jolted by conflicting sets of rules and regulations, depending on the state of the pandemic at your destination. It can be a dizzying experience.

Whiplash on U.S. Vaccine Mandate Leaves Employers ‘Totally Confused’
Companies are struggling with uncertainty from legal battles, shifting deadlines and rising Covid cases. Even the meaning of “fully vaccinated” is up in the air. The recent virus surge has raised the issue of whether the government will take its requirements further and ask employers to mandate booster shots.

The Chinese Coronavirus as U.S. Military Biological Warfare

COVID-19 and the CIA’s Biological Warfare against Cuba

Wuhan Coronavirus: A Biological Weapon against China?

Was the 2020 Wuhan Coronavirus (COVID-19) an Engineered Biological Attack on China by America for Geopolitical Advantage?

Covid-19: A Psychological Military Operation, Part I

Why the Virus Has Never Been Proven To Exist, Why the “Pandemic” Is a Psychological Operation, and More

Bacterial Pneumonia Caused Most Deaths in 1918 Influenza Pandemic
Implications for Future Pandemic PlanningThe majority of deaths during the influenza pandemic of 1918-1919 were not caused by the influenza virus acting alone, report researchers from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health. Instead, most victims succumbed to bacterial pneumonia following influenza virus infection. The pneumonia was caused when bacteria that normally inhabit the nose and throat invaded the lungs along a pathway created when the virus destroyed the cells that line the bronchial tubes and lungs.

2 Dead, 54 Sickened in Respiratory Outbreak at Virginia Assisted Living Facility

CDC Inspection Findings Reveal more about Fort Detrick Research Suspension

Deadly Germ Research Is Shut Down at Army Lab Over Safety Concerns
Problems with disposal of dangerous materials led the government to suspend research at the military’s leading biodefense center.

CDC Issues a “Cease and Desist Order” to Halt the Research at Fort Detrick
Late June, 2019: The CDC goes to Fort Detrick and find they have not been following protocols of containment. CDC issues a “cease and desist order” to halt the research at Fort Detrick at its highest-security labs. The CDC says that “national security reasons” prevent it from releasing more details. The suspended research involves certain toxins, called ‘Select Agents and Toxins’, which are housed at the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID) at Fort Detrick. The CDC demonstrated a failure of the Army laboratory to “implement and maintain containment procedures sufficient to contain select agents or toxins”. On the list of agents & toxins housed at Fort Detrick is Coronavirus.

The Hunt for Patient Zero

Lab-Made Coronavirus Triggers Debate

The Concern for Secretive Bio-Geopolitics

The Mystery of the African Swine Fever in China and Asia

COVID-19 Cases of Unknown Source Perplex Researchers

Moderately Strong Confirmation of a Laboratory Origin of 2019-nCoV

SARS-Like Virus in Bats Shows Potential to Infect Humans, Study Finds

Dr. Fauci Backed Controversial Wuhan Lab with U.S. Dollars for Risky Coronavirus Research

Intelligence Report Warned of Coronavirus Crisis as Early as November: Sources
“Analysts concluded it could be a cataclysmic event,” a source said.

U.S. alerted Israel, NATO to Disease Outbreak in China in November — TV Report
White House was reportedly not interested in the intel, but it was passed onto NATO, IDF; when it reached Israel’s Health Ministry, ‘nothing was done’

Wuhan Lab Infected ‘Humanized Mice’ with Bat Coronaviruses in 2019
Did experiments with new bat viruses in transgenic mice lead to COVID-19 pandemic?

WHO Inspector Caught on Camera Revealing Coronavirus Manipulation in Wuhan Before Pandemic
Video shows scientist mention coronavirus experimentation in Wuhan lab weeks before pandemic

A Science in the Shadows
Controls on ‘gain of function’ experiments with supercharged pathogens have been undercut despite concerns about lab leaks

A Conflict of Interest: How can Peter Daszak, a British Scientist Who Helped Fund Controversial Experiments on Coronaviruses by China’s Batwoman, be Part of WHO’s Team Investigating the Original Source of the Outbreak?
British scientist Peter Daszak’s organisation channelled cash to Wuhan scientists. He has spent much of the past year trying to counter claims of a possible lab leak. But he was invited by WHO to join its team of ten experts investigating outbreak.

In Major Shift, NIH Admits Funding Risky Virus Research in Wuhan
A spokesman for Dr. Fauci says he has been “entirely truthful,” but a new letter belatedly acknowledging the National Institutes of Health’s support for virus-enhancing research adds more heat to the ongoing debate over whether a lab leak could have sparked the pandemic.

Bats, Gene Editing, and Bioweapons: Recent DARPA Experiments Raise Concerns Amid Coronavirus Outbreak
DARPA recently spent millions on research involving bats and coronaviruses, as well as gene editing “bioweapons” prior to the recent coronavirus outbreak. Now, “strategic allies” of the agency have been chosen to develop a genetic material-based vaccine to halt the potential epidemic.

American Pravda: Our Coronavirus Catastrophe as Biowarfare Blowback?

American Pravda: Covid-19, Its Impact and Origins After One Year

American Pravda: “The Truth” and “The Whole Truth” About the Origins of Covid-19

American Pravda: George Orwell’s Virus Lab-Leak

The Covid BioWeapon: Made in the USA, Aimed at China

American Pravda: Covid Epidemic as Lab-Leak or Biowarfare?

American Pravda: Waging Biological Warfare

American Pravda: Confronting Covid Crimestop

What America’s 17 Intelligence Agencies Won’t Say About the Origins of Covid

For example, in 2017 Trump brought in Robert Kadlec, who since the 1990s had been one of America’s leading biowarfare advocates. The following year in 2018 a mysterious viral epidemic hit China’s poultry industry and in 2019, another mysterious viral epidemic devastated China’s pork industry…

From the earliest days of the administration, leading Trump officials had regarded China as America’s most formidable geopolitical adversary, and orchestrated a policy of confrontation. Then from January to August 2019, Kadlec’s department ran the “Crimson Contagion” simulation exercise, involving the hypothetical outbreak of a dangerous respiratory viral disease in China, which eventually spreads into the United States, with the participants focusing on the necessary measures to control it in this country. As one of America’s foremost biowarfare experts, Kadlec had emphasized the unique effectiveness of bioweapons as far back as the late 1990s and we must commend him for his considerable prescience in having organized a major viral epidemic exercise in 2019 that was so remarkably similar to what actually began in the real world just a few months later.

With leading Trump officials greatly enamored of biowarfare, fiercely hostile to China, and running large-scale 2019 simulations on the consequences of a mysterious viral outbreak in that country, it seems entirely unreasonable to completely disregard the possibility that such extremely reckless plans may have been privately discussed and eventually implemented, though probably without presidential authorization.

But with the horrific consequences of our own later governmental inaction being obvious, elements within our intelligence agencies have sought to demonstrate that they were not the ones asleep at the switch. Earlier this month, an ABC News story cited four separate government sources to reveal that as far back as late November, a special medical intelligence unit within our Defense Intelligence Agency had produced a report warning that an out-of-control disease epidemic was occurring in the Wuhan area of China, and widely distributed that document throughout the top ranks of our government, warning that steps should be taken to protect US forces based in Asia. After the story aired, a Pentagon spokesman officially denied the existence of that November report, while various other top level government and intelligence officials refused to comment. But a few days later, Israeli television mentioned that in November American intelligence had indeed shared such a report on the Wuhan disease outbreak with its NATO and Israeli allies, thus seeming to independently confirm the complete accuracy of the original ABC News story and its several government sources.

It therefore appears that elements of the Defense Intelligence Agency were aware of the deadly viral outbreak in Wuhan more than a month before any officials in the Chinese government itself. Unless our intelligence agencies have pioneered the technology of precognition, I think this may have happened for the same reason that arsonists have the earliest knowledge of future fires.

According to these multiply-sourced mainstream media accounts, by “the second week of November” our Defense Intelligence Agency was already preparing a secret report warning of a “cataclysmic” disease outbreak taking place in Wuhan. Yet at that point, probably no more than a couple of dozen individuals had been infected in that city of 11 million, with few of those yet having any serious symptoms. The implications are rather obvious. Furthermore:

As the coronavirus gradually began to spread beyond China’s own borders, another development occurred that greatly multiplied my suspicions. Most of these early cases had occurred exactly where one might expect, among the East Asian countries bordering China. But by late February Iran had become the second epicenter of the global outbreak. Even more surprisingly, its political elites had been especially hard-hit, with a full 10% of the entire Iranian parliament soon infected and at least a dozen of its officials and politicians dying of the disease, including some who were quite senior. Indeed, Neocon activists on Twitter began gleefully noting that their hated Iranian enemies were now dropping like flies.

Let us consider the implications of these facts. Across the entire world the only political elites that have yet suffered any significant human losses have been those of Iran, and they died at a very early stage, before significant outbreaks had even occurred almost anywhere else in the world outside China. Thus, we have America assassinating Iran’s top military commander on Jan. 2nd and then just a few weeks later large portions of the Iranian ruling elites became infected by a mysterious and deadly new virus, with many of them soon dying as a consequence. Could any rational individual possibly regard this as a mere coincidence?

How Finland and Norway Proved Sweden’s Approach to COVID-19 Works

A Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Lockdowns on Covid-19 Mortality

COVID-19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless
Though the whole world relies on RT-PCR to “diagnose” SARS-CoV-2 infection, the science is clear: they are not fit for purpose

Open Letter: Refuting Politifact’s “Fact Check”

07/21/2021: Lab Alert: Changes to CDC RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Testing

COVID-19 Death Data and Resources
NCHS is responding to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) with new resources to help monitor and report deaths from COVID-19. Below please find our latest provisional death counts, guidance for filling out death certificates for deaths due to COVID-19, and other important alerts and information.

CDC Sued for Hiding COVID Vaccine Safety Data

COVID-19 Fatality Rate “in the Ballpark of Seasonal Influenza”

The Foegen Effect – A Mechanism by Which Facemasks Contribute to the COVID-19 Case Fatality Rate

28,103 Deaths 2,637,525 Injuries Following COVID Shots in European Database of Adverse Reactions
The European database of suspected drug reaction reports is EudraVigilance, which also tracks reports of injuries and deaths following the experimental COVID-19 “vaccines.” They are now reporting that through October 19, 2021 there are 28,103 deaths and 2,637,525 injuries reported following injections of four experimental COVID-19 vaccines.

OpenVAERS
VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System put in place in 1990. It is a voluntary reporting system that has been estimated to account for only 1% (see the Lazarus Report) of vaccine injuries. OpenVAERS is built from the HHS data available for download at vaers.hhs.gov. The OpenVAERS Project allows browsing and searching of the reports without the need to compose an advanced search (more advanced searches can be done at medalerts.org or vaers.hhs.gov).

VAERS – Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System
VAERS Data
VAERS data is accessible by downloading raw data in comma-separated value (CSV) files for import into a database, spreadsheet, or text editing program, or by using the CDC WONDER online search tool. Information provided to VAERS which identifies a person who received the vaccine or vaccines will not be made available to the public. De-identified VAERS data are available 4-6 weeks after the report is received. VAERS data change as new reports are received, so your results may change if you repeat the same search at a later date. To learn more about interpreting data see Guide to Interpreting VAERS Data.

Pathogenic Priming Likely Contributes to Serious and Critical Illness and Mortality in COVID-19 Via Autoimmunity

Innate Immune Suppression by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccinations: The Role of G-quadruplexes, Exosomes, and MicroRNAs

Pre-Exposure to mRNA-LNP Inhibits Adaptive Immune Responses and Alters Innate Immune Fitness in an Inheritable Fashion

Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in Randomized Trials in Adults

Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning

Reevaluation of Antibody-Dependent Enhancement of Infection in Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Therapeutic Antibodies and mRNA-Vaccine Antisera using FcR- and ACE2-Positive Cells

Community Transmission and Viral Load Kinetics of the SARS-CoV-2 Delta (B.1.617.2) Variant in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Individuals in the UK: a Prospective, Longitudinal, Cohort Study

The Alpha variant emerged in the UK in October, which was when Oxford-AstraZeneca was holding vaccine trials there.
The Beta variant emerged in South Africa, and was first detected in December, 2020, at the tail end of trial periods for both Oxford-AstraZeneca and Pfizer vaccines. This variant carries three mutations in the spike protein.
The Gamma variant was first detected in Japan, but soon after in Brazil, making the origin a little harder to determine. But since Japan has had far lower viral spread than Brazil, it makes the most sense that Brazil was the source. Both Oxford-AstraZeneca and Pfizer trialed their vaccines in Brazil.
The Delta variant was first detected in India in October, 2020. India hosted numerous vaccine trials including one for Oxford-AstraZeneca and one for Covishield.

According to P’s own data, when suspected cases are included in control and trial, relative risk reduction drops down to 19%. It goes without saying absolute risk reduction is then almost statistically zero.

Furthermore, The P trials DID NOT test all participants for C19. Instead, they instructed their investigators to test only those with a C19 symptom and left it up to their discretion to decide what those were. This allowed investigators to influence trial results.

In addition, they didn’t test for adverse events at the subclinical (pre-symptom) level. This was extremely unsafe, because symptoms/diseases are typically end points of processes that can take months, years, or decades to surface. By the time you get to symptoms, things can have gone pretty wrong. (Think diabetes or high blood pressure, where the disease can be quite advanced before any symptoms occur.). For example, micro-clots resulting from the inoculation that were insufficient to cause observable symptoms could raise the baseline for thrombotic disease in the future. P should have been tracking biomarkers that would have been early warning indicators for disease caused by the inoculations.

Moreover, P only observed 2 groups: UNEXPOSED & INOCULATED, UNEXPOSED & NOT INOCULATED. They should have included two more groups: EXPOSED & INOCULATED, EXPOSED & NOT INOCULATED. Worse, they unblinded the control group after only 2 months of trials and invited them to join the trial group. This has left us without a control to assess safety.

They manipulated the trial by rigging participation. 95% of people who have died with C19 had at least 1 co-morbidity listed as cause of death. The average is 4 co-morbidities. Only 21% had a co-existing condition in trial. In addition, they only included 4% of the target demographic in the trial (those aged >75 years which make up over 84% of deaths).

Many health conditions- in fact a list several pages long – were excluded from the trials, including pregnant or breastfeeding women, people with allergies, with psychiatric conditions, immunocompromised people, people with bleeding disorders, people who had previously tested positive for C19, people who had been prescribed steroids, etc., so there HAS NEVER been any data to make safety claims about those people.

Why didn’t they test before and after inoculations for D-Dimer, C-reactive protein, troponins, occludin, blood oxygen levels, amyloid-beta or phosphorylated tau, Serum HMGB1 or literally anything at all to lend credence that harm was not a result of the vaccine? They could have easily done these tests during the trial but didn’t.

In the child trials, P failed to report serious adverse events. For example, Maddie de Garay is a 12 year old trial participant who developed a serious reaction after her second dose and was hospitalized within 24 hours. Maddie developed gastroparesis, nausea and vomiting, erratic blood pressure, memory loss, brain fog, headaches, dizziness, fainting, seizures, verbal and motor tics, menstrual cycle issues, lost feeling from the waist down, lost bowel and bladder control and had an nasogastric tube placed because she lost her ability to eat. She has been hospitalized many times, and for the past 10 months she has been wheelchair bound and fed via tube. In their report to the FDA, Pfizer described her injuries as “functional abdominal pain.”

84% of P study report authors had and continue to have conflicts of interest, including two major authors and founders of BioNTEch who directly profited to the tune of $9B.

1884 Athlete Cardiac Arrests or Serious Issues, 1310 of Them Dead, Since COVID Injection

2022 Death List – Athletes / Celebrities who have Collapsed or had Medical Episodes or Vaccine Related Injuries or Deaths

2021 Death List – Athletes / Celebrities who have Collapsed or had Medical Episodes or Vaccine Related Injuries or Deaths

All You Need To Know About COVID Vaccine Safety

COVID Deaths Before and After Vaccination Programs

Fauci’s Retirement Pay Will Exceed $350,000 Per Year: The Largest In U.S. Federal Government History

The U.S. Billionaires Profiting the Most from the Pandemic

U.S. Billionaires’ Wealth Soars 70% During Pandemic: Report

U.S. Billionaires’ Wealth Spiked 70% Amid COVID-19 Pandemic

700 U.S. Billionaires Got $1.7 Trillion Richer During Two Years of Pandemic

How Much Money America’s Billionaires Have Made During the Covid-19 Pandemic

U.S. Billionaires Got 62 Percent Richer During Pandemic. They’re Now Up $1.8 Trillion.